SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Moderator: Moderator

brandonito
Player
Posts: 42
Joined: 4 months ago
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by brandonito » 1 week ago

chrisl7605 wrote:
1 week ago
HaRdHouse wrote:
1 week ago
Your opponent has already suffered heavy losses today, and his sentry force is on full alert. Your sabotage will not succeed until they let their guard down.
I'm confused.

You guys seem to be impressed by your war efforts.

RB/RL/GLD had a combined value of like 2.5-3bil

SR+Flop had a combined 7bil chain value and youre bragging about the damage you've caused?

Dont forget that you declared thus dropping our starting war value by like 20% lol

Either way I'm glad you guys are enjoying yourselves but dont fool yourselves into thinking your war efforts are impressive when you decided not to declare on the chain with similar value.
Those numbers aren't even remotely accurate tbh - Your chain value was fairly close to SR's when they declared war.

Aggie
Player
Posts: 11
Joined: 4 months ago
Has thanked: 3 times

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by Aggie » 1 week ago

brandonito wrote:
1 week ago

Those numbers aren't even remotely accurate tbh - Your chain value was fairly close to SR's when they declared war.
Numbers aren't even close indeed...
Maybe George can provide us numbers which are a bit closer to the truth?

Aggie
Player
Posts: 11
Joined: 4 months ago
Has thanked: 3 times

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by Aggie » 1 week ago

Unfortunately the closest values we have are from the 21st of June. About 2 weeks before we declared.

https://gyazo.com/64448d2f54e82e93347a0cbeb9c31f80

I'm sure SR had a small lead at the 4th of July, but certainly not the lead chris say's we had...

User avatar
HaRdHouse
Player
Posts: 32
Joined: 4 months ago
Location: Paradise
Alliance: SR
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 4 times
Contact:

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by HaRdHouse » 1 week ago

All I keep seeing is: "SR is too big" or "SR cheats". Where are the arguments? I wanna see facts, not words
Guys, don't forget that you also had members:
RL: 40
RB: 42
Glads: 28
LGC: 21
NWO: 12
+ the inactives ones and so on.

It's not our fault that some left you when this started. Don't start and cry here, and take it as it should.
You guys burned my account in the day I sold. If I didn't done that, I would have lost a ton of gold. I admit and I give you that. Great effort in there.

Let's keep it real, please.

Alex
8-) 8-) Check out my Fiverr gigs: https://www.fiverr.com/hardhouse 8-) 8-)

chrisl7605
Player
Posts: 39
Joined: 4 months ago
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by chrisl7605 » 1 week ago

Aggie wrote:
1 week ago
Unfortunately the closest values we have are from the 21st of June. About 2 weeks before we declared.

https://gyazo.com/64448d2f54e82e93347a0cbeb9c31f80

I'm sure SR had a small lead at the 4th of July, but certainly not the lead chris say's we had...
Good numbers. But are we really going to include LGC/TOF? A chain that hasnt warred in 6 years and were only with us in a growth deal? I specifically left them out in my original post.

ny numbers were slightly off but I was also under on the value of your chain.

How much did Neo/Flop chain account for? Another 2 tril for your side?

So 7.5tril value vs 4 tril value.

-800,000,000 (20 %) to start considering you guys declared.

chrisl7605
Player
Posts: 39
Joined: 4 months ago
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by chrisl7605 » 1 week ago

HaRdHouse wrote:
1 week ago
All I keep seeing is: "SR is too big" or "SR cheats". Where are the arguments? I wanna see facts, not words
Guys, don't forget that you also had members:
RL: 40
RB: 42
Glads: 28
LGC: 21
NWO: 12
+ the inactives ones and so on.

It's not our fault that some left you when this started. Don't start and cry here, and take it as it should.
You guys burned my account in the day I sold. If I didn't done that, I would have lost a ton of gold. I admit and I give you that. Great effort in there.

Let's keep it real, please.

Alex
If including lgc/tof makes you feel better then by all means include them.

But those living in reality know they havent warred in 6 years and wernt going to start now.

User avatar
HaRdHouse
Player
Posts: 32
Joined: 4 months ago
Location: Paradise
Alliance: SR
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 4 times
Contact:

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by HaRdHouse » 1 week ago

chrisl7605 wrote:
1 week ago
HaRdHouse wrote:
1 week ago
All I keep seeing is: "SR is too big" or "SR cheats". Where are the arguments? I wanna see facts, not words
Guys, don't forget that you also had members:
RL: 40
RB: 42
Glads: 28
LGC: 21
NWO: 12
+ the inactives ones and so on.

It's not our fault that some left you when this started. Don't start and cry here, and take it as it should.
You guys burned my account in the day I sold. If I didn't done that, I would have lost a ton of gold. I admit and I give you that. Great effort in there.

Let's keep it real, please.

Alex
If including lgc/tof makes you feel better then by all means include them.

But those living in reality know they havent warred in 6 years and wernt going to start now.

Yes, I agree with you that they didn't warred in ages, but they gave you growth before war, right?
8-) 8-) Check out my Fiverr gigs: https://www.fiverr.com/hardhouse 8-) 8-)

User avatar
HaRdHouse
Player
Posts: 32
Joined: 4 months ago
Location: Paradise
Alliance: SR
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 4 times
Contact:

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by HaRdHouse » 1 week ago

ITIT (not active)
8-) 8-) Check out my Fiverr gigs: https://www.fiverr.com/hardhouse 8-) 8-)

JayAlt
Player
Posts: 60
Joined: 2 months ago
Alliance: Gladiators
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by JayAlt » 1 week ago

HaRdHouse wrote:
1 week ago
All I keep seeing is: "SR is too big" or "SR cheats". Where are the arguments? I wanna see facts, not words
Guys, don't forget that you also had members:
RL: 40
RB: 42
Glads: 28
LGC: 21
NWO: 12
+ the inactives ones and so on.

It's not our fault that some left you when this started. Don't start and cry here, and take it as it should.
You guys burned my account in the day I sold. If I didn't done that, I would have lost a ton of gold. I admit and I give you that. Great effort in there.

Let's keep it real, please.

Alex
I don't know where your doing your math. Without LGC thats 122 with 143. You can't tell me your side of the war isn't close to 100 people bigger. We got 123 members in SR alone, then throw in:

DEMK: 38
FLOP: 28
Big Trey Deuce Gang (Great Name BTW Neo): 16
= 205 members

+ Other Miscellaneous alliances with FLOP members
+ your inactives which is probably not as much as RBs but not a massive difference.

So as you said, let's keep it real.

However, I am not saying its any excuse to be losing this war, because Glads beat DEMK when we had 10-15 less members at the start of the war. NSG included in that total. (They're aren't an alliance anymore btw, so idk why they're in the title of this topic.)

User avatar
Neophyte
Player
Posts: 16
Joined: 4 months ago
Location: Denmark
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by Neophyte » 1 week ago

Mine is bigger..
A1 since Day 1..
.. for Rez and Wes. Never forgotten.

Post Reply