Page 14 of 39

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2019 10:35 am
by Aggie
chrisl7605 wrote:
1 year ago

I'll be honest TBC sabbing your main was retarded but teaming with flop and adding GLD/TOF/LGC to your warlist doesnt make it an equal fight.
Maybe not, but you can always move your chain elswhere like LGC/ToF did.
ROLYAT wrote:
1 year ago

Piss off too many this era? Sounds like a standard day in the life of GLD. Lots of snowflakes playing this game.
So you piss off some players and you're suprised when they join in on the fun?
It's just like you said, a standard day in the life of GLD. You create havoc, you will face the results. It's no rocket science really...

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2019 2:13 pm
by ROLYAT
Aggie wrote:
1 year ago
chrisl7605 wrote:
1 year ago

I'll be honest TBC sabbing your main was retarded but teaming with flop and adding GLD/TOF/LGC to your warlist doesnt make it an equal fight.
Maybe not, but you can always move your chain elswhere like LGC/ToF did.
ROLYAT wrote:
1 year ago

Piss off too many this era? Sounds like a standard day in the life of GLD. Lots of snowflakes playing this game.
So you piss off some players and you're suprised when they join in on the fun?
It's just like you said, a standard day in the life of GLD. You create havoc, you will face the results. It's no rocket science really...
None of us are surprised DEMK asked you guys for help.

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2019 2:44 pm
by The RMFz
Yes, we signed up for more sabbers on us. *slow clap*

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2019 3:23 pm
by chrisl7605
Aggie wrote:
1 year ago
chrisl7605 wrote:
1 year ago

I'll be honest TBC sabbing your main was retarded but teaming with flop and adding GLD/TOF/LGC to your warlist doesnt make it an equal fight.
Maybe not, but you can always move your chain elswhere like LGC/ToF did.
Yeah you and I both know that's not going to happen because SR told us too.

We also dont meet demands of alliances that declared on us with no reasoning.

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2019 5:18 pm
by Aggie
You need reasoning?
How about you provide growth to a chain who sabbed 12x over 2 missed hits?
We never forced you to stay in chain. We never forced you to leave chain. But we both know if you would have left chain you would have been taken off our warlist.

So stop whining and take it like a man if you aren't moving your ass!

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2019 5:48 pm
by HaRdHouse
On ITIT:
Total sabbed already today 45,914,000,000

10 mins after he went active was maxed. Kinda nice if you ask me.

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2019 7:02 pm
by ROLYAT
Aggie wrote:
1 year ago
You need reasoning?
How about you provide growth to a chain who sabbed 12x over 2 missed hits?
We never forced you to stay in chain. We never forced you to leave chain. But we both know if you would have left chain you would have been taken off our warlist.

So stop whining and take it like a man if you aren't moving your ass!
Interesting that you play the growth card when it's in your favor. I distinctly remember SR said they had no intention of getting involved in the GLD/DEMK war as you guys are separate alliances. Seems that position changes when DEMK begs for assistance and you guys already have the era secured.

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2019 7:40 pm
by Aggie
ROLYAT wrote:
1 year ago

Interesting that you play the growth card when it's in your favor. I distinctly remember SR said they had no intention of getting involved in the GLD/DEMK war as you guys are separate alliances. Seems that position changes when DEMK begs for assistance and you guys already have the era secured.
Not sure what you try to assume here, but I never played the growth card before.
Also, DEMK never ever asked for SR's assistance. I'm sure you won't believe that, but idc what you think really.
I already explained why we declared and why we added LGC/ToF/GLD.
LGC/ToF left, you stayed. Again, it's no rocket science.

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2019 8:04 pm
by HaRdHouse
ROLYAT wrote:
1 year ago
Aggie wrote:
1 year ago
You need reasoning?
How about you provide growth to a chain who sabbed 12x over 2 missed hits?
We never forced you to stay in chain. We never forced you to leave chain. But we both know if you would have left chain you would have been taken off our warlist.

So stop whining and take it like a man if you aren't moving your ass!
Interesting that you play the growth card when it's in your favor. I distinctly remember SR said they had no intention of getting involved in the GLD/DEMK war as you guys are separate alliances. Seems that position changes when DEMK begs for assistance and you guys already have the era secured.
We "play" the growth every age because we have the most awesome members. Go deal with that :) or wait... recruit some

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2019 6:08 am
by JayAlt
bloodpirate wrote:
1 year ago
JayAlt wrote:
1 year ago

at least your standing up for yourself and not letting people just raid and sab your alliance with no retaliation. *cough* *cough*
why thank you .. my alliance is doing good, sitting there and doing nothing, mostly not even logging in while on vacation, but not going inactive. hopefully you aren't getting a cold with that nasty cough of yours. a throat lozenge might help

bowie 1,018 1,770 Hobbits -100 gzz36u5x
last login 2 months and 1 week ago

he is going around the world in a hot air balloon .. should take about 80 days. ask Jules Verne
wow lol, wasn't even talking about you. was talking about the alliances who didn't get involved, man you're thick. You know LGC/TOF/LaCN/Cerb, all of them are getting sabbed and raided and do nothing to protect their members, those guys, not you.