SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP/LaCN vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

- 8/17/19

Moderator: Moderator

Locked
bloodpirate
Player
Posts: 394
Joined: 9 months ago
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by bloodpirate » 4 months ago

chrisl7605 wrote:
4 months ago

Also funny to see BP join in this war when he was complaining in our last thread about players quiting over war.
i had no real choice.

13 officers total | page 1 of 2
4 officers logged in today

NWO dragged me into it, litterally. they almost put a BPM to my head and forced me. are you going to blame me for

ITIT (not active)
GremRyda (not active)

so be it. i was farming/sabbing who i could. funny how one player gets blamed for what 100 plus players are doing.

JayAlt
Player
Posts: 60
Joined: 6 months ago
Alliance: Gladiators
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by JayAlt » 4 months ago

bloodpirate wrote:
4 months ago
chrisl7605 wrote:
4 months ago

Also funny to see BP join in this war when he was complaining in our last thread about players quiting over war.
i had no real choice.

13 officers total | page 1 of 2
4 officers logged in today

NWO dragged me into it, litterally. they almost put a BPM to my head and forced me. are you going to blame me for

ITIT (not active)
GremRyda (not active)

so be it. i was farming/sabbing who i could. funny how one player gets blamed for what 100 plus players are doing.
at least your standing up for yourself and not letting people just raid and sab your alliance with no retaliation. *cough* *cough*

bloodpirate
Player
Posts: 394
Joined: 9 months ago
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by bloodpirate » 4 months ago

JayAlt wrote:
4 months ago

at least your standing up for yourself and not letting people just raid and sab your alliance with no retaliation. *cough* *cough*
why thank you .. my alliance is doing good, sitting there and doing nothing, mostly not even logging in while on vacation, but not going inactive. hopefully you aren't getting a cold with that nasty cough of yours. a throat lozenge might help

bowie 1,018 1,770 Hobbits -100 gzz36u5x
last login 2 months and 1 week ago

he is going around the world in a hot air balloon .. should take about 80 days. ask Jules Verne

Aggie
Player
Posts: 55
Joined: 9 months ago
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Era Winner

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by Aggie » 4 months ago

chrisl7605 wrote:
4 months ago
SR 5.2 Tril
RL/RB/LGC/TOF = 5.2 tril
AG = 4.6 tril

flop = 2.0 tril

LGC/tof = 1tril
Yes, and this is the last time ill repeat myself. There's no point in including LGC/ToF unless you're trying to feel better about yourself, they were never going to war.

LGC/ToF made up about a tril of the originally post chain value.

which would have put our chain value at about 4tril.

Not only did you guys declare as SR 5.2tril value (i assume DEMK is included in that total) you also declared with half of AG (flop and neos group of rouges) so thats another 2tril chain value on your side. Bringing your total value to 7.2tril (which is a low estimate).

Tack on the fact that you declared, we would have started the war with a minimum 20% loss on that 4tril value(total daily loss is 30%). Which would bring our starting chain value 3.2tril (a high estimate).

So at most, after 30 minutes of war, its fair to say that the war was 7.2tril vs 3.2tril value.

That being said the only person who lost in this war is Bon and the only winner seems to be Dank.

Also funny to see BP join in this war when he was complaining in our last thread about players quiting over war.
And this is the last time I repeat myself.
LGC/ToF are included because they provided you a LOT of growth. They are also responsible for your value and we warred them the first day and they retalliated. So yes they warred, even if it was for a day or 2.

And maybe you care to explain how you get to a trillion value for LGC/ToF? A bit of substantiation would be nice.

Also, we didn't declare with half of AG (flop and neos group of rouges). So that's NOT another 2Tril?!? chain value on our side. They decided to jump in later. So that doesn't bring our chain value to an 'estimated' 7.2Tril.

And the assumption we managed to max ALL your players in the first strike would be the biggest joke in your entire post here man... Especially the bigger values were far away from being maxed, and I higly doubt the people that were maxable were actually maxed.

The only thing I agree with you on are the credits to Dank. He's holding up pretty good, and by far the most experienced warmachine.
If you all had listened to half he said, you would have been able to at least put up a decent fight!

chrisl7605
Player
Posts: 66
Joined: 9 months ago
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by chrisl7605 » 4 months ago

Aggie wrote:
4 months ago
chrisl7605 wrote:
4 months ago
SR 5.2 Tril
RL/RB/LGC/TOF = 5.2 tril
AG = 4.6 tril

flop = 2.0 tril

LGC/tof = 1tril
Yes, and this is the last time ill repeat myself. There's no point in including LGC/ToF unless you're trying to feel better about yourself, they were never going to war.

LGC/ToF made up about a tril of the originally post chain value.

which would have put our chain value at about 4tril.

Not only did you guys declare as SR 5.2tril value (i assume DEMK is included in that total) you also declared with half of AG (flop and neos group of rouges) so thats another 2tril chain value on your side. Bringing your total value to 7.2tril (which is a low estimate).

Tack on the fact that you declared, we would have started the war with a minimum 20% loss on that 4tril value(total daily loss is 30%). Which would bring our starting chain value 3.2tril (a high estimate).

So at most, after 30 minutes of war, its fair to say that the war was 7.2tril vs 3.2tril value.

That being said the only person who lost in this war is Bon and the only winner seems to be Dank.

Also funny to see BP join in this war when he was complaining in our last thread about players quiting over war.
And this is the last time I repeat myself.
LGC/ToF are included because they provided you a LOT of growth. They are also responsible for your value and we warred them the first day and they retalliated. So yes they warred, even if it was for a day or 2.

And maybe you care to explain how you get to a trillion value for LGC/ToF? A bit of substantiation would be nice.

Also, we didn't declare with half of AG (flop and neos group of rouges). So that's NOT another 2Tril?!? chain value on our side. They decided to jump in later. So that doesn't bring our chain value to an 'estimated' 7.2Tril.

And the assumption we managed to max ALL your players in the first strike would be the biggest joke in your entire post here man... Especially the bigger values were far away from being maxed, and I higly doubt the people that were maxable were actually maxed.

The only thing I agree with you on are the credits to Dank. He's holding up pretty good, and by far the most experienced warmachine.
If you all had listened to half he said, you would have been able to at least put up a decent fight!
Total Sabbed on GO Script: 661,804,705,000 (24hrs) << This was after 12 hours. So I was a little aggressive on the timing but considering this doesn't include flop/neo I was probably well under on the total damage you guys caused in 24 hours.

"And the assumption we managed to max ALL your players in the first strike would be the biggest joke in your entire post here man... "

You're right, it would be the biggest joke. That's why I didn't and used 20%, not 30%.

~Lord Galdors Clan~ 614.1b
..::Tears of Fury::.. 368.4b

^^ According to RB script those are lgc/tof "current" chain values. Looking at RB script none of their mains have been updated in about a week and a majority of their members haven't been updated in about 12 days. Also, no more than 2 of them sabbed you guys after you declared.

This was never going to be a decent fight. It was 208 v 118 and you drew first blood.

Maybe next age Glad will declare on LGC/TOF/EK and then brag about kicking the crap out of EK when LGC/TOF surrenders. Bold strategy.

User avatar
HaRdHouse
Player
Posts: 48
Joined: 9 months ago
Location: Paradise
Alliance: SR
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 8 times
Contact:

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by HaRdHouse » 4 months ago

So next age if SR will be in RB/RL/GLD & friends situation and you guys declare on us, I can use the same crying motive? "You guys too big?' or "You have more value" ?
Just asking..
8-) 8-) Check out my Fiverr gigs: https://www.fiverr.com/hardhouse 8-) 8-)

Aggie
Player
Posts: 55
Joined: 9 months ago
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Era Winner

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by Aggie » 4 months ago

Ohw, and because you don't have the numbers it was never going to be a decent fight?
Think about that when you decide to sab a main or first trickle over a missed hit... Twice! Thinking that you were going to get away with it is just naive.

It's not our fault we have the numbers and value. I guess you have pissed off too many this era. And see the result.

chrisl7605
Player
Posts: 66
Joined: 9 months ago
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by chrisl7605 » 4 months ago

HaRdHouse wrote:
4 months ago
So next age if SR will be in RB/RL/GLD & friends situation and you guys declare on us, I can use the same crying motive? "You guys too big?' or "You have more value" ?
Just asking..
No offense to lacn/Cerb/RB/RL/GFlop but I have 0 intention on declaring war with them so I have 0 intention on warring SR.

I enjoy warring with Glads and I enjoy strategic wars like we had with DEMK.

The only issue we had with SR was over a mishit sab on Bullah which was resolved pretty peacefully. I'll be honest TBC sabbing your main was retarded but teaming with flop and adding GLD/TOF/LGC to your warlist doesnt make it an equal fight.

ROLYAT
Player
Posts: 64
Joined: 9 months ago
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by ROLYAT » 4 months ago

Aggie wrote:
4 months ago
Ohw, and because you don't have the numbers it was never going to be a decent fight?
Think about that when you decide to sab a main or first trickle over a missed hit... Twice! Thinking that you were going to get away with it is just naive.

It's not our fault we have the numbers and value. I guess you have pissed off too many this era. And see the result.
Piss off too many this era? Sounds like a standard day in the life of GLD. Lots of snowflakes playing this game.

The RMFz
Player
Posts: 45
Joined: 9 months ago
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO

Post by The RMFz » 4 months ago

chrisl7605 wrote:
4 months ago
I enjoy strategic wars like we had with DEMK.
Word ^^

Locked