Kings Of Chaos :: Forums

Mikeoh wrote: ↑2 years ago

Plurpilicious wrote: ↑2 years ago

Mikeoh wrote: ↑2 years ago

Could have fought us 1 Vs 1, would have been a glorious war not this cowards approach.

Who the fuck cares about glory? LaCN had the halo of protection from DEMK, our goals no longer matched and halo of protection was gone so the hordes were let loose. From the Warhammer 40k books I've been reading there is only glory in death so I'm thinking you should be happy in the death of LaCN's era?

DEMK betrayed their "allies" but didn't even have the bottle to do it themselves so had to ask for help from a bunch of alliances on the downturn

Well our alliance was already broke up. Yes, it would have been a glorious war 1v1, but winning quickly and hitting hard makes better tactical sense anyway. I'd say it is pretty glorious right now from where I'm sitting

Mikeoh wrote: ↑2 years ago

AxEHeaD15 wrote: ↑2 years ago Why would we let you win the age?

Could have fought us 1 Vs 1, would have been a glorious war not this cowards approach.

Imagine if all era DEMK told every alliance that asked:

"nah we aren't allied to LaCN" or "we wouldn't have LaCN's back if you jumped them"

You would have lost like 3 wars already by the time we decided to 1v1 you. Destruction was always coming for you. Don't make military alliances you don't intend to honor, especially with us. You're welcome for a peaceful 80% of this era.

Evilmiget0021 wrote: ↑2 years ago

Mikeoh wrote: ↑2 years ago

AxEHeaD15 wrote: ↑2 years ago Why would we let you win the age?

Could have fought us 1 Vs 1, would have been a glorious war not this cowards approach.

Imagine if all era DEMK told every alliance that asked:

"nah we aren't allied to LaCN" or "we wouldn't have LaCN's back if you jumped them"

You would have lost like 3 wars already by the time we decided to 1v1 you. Destruction was always coming for you. Don't make military alliances you don't intend to honor, especially with us. You're welcome for a peaceful 80% of this era.

What hasn't been said is that DEMK wouldn't budge from wanting to war Cerb/RL ( Seems you were fed BS info ) when we wanted to war NWO/RL.
AFAIK when you make a "military alliance" you have to come to a mutual agreement which we couldn't so that was the straw that broke the camels back.

So in short, we wouldn't do what you wanted to you chucked a tantrum

Elmo_LaCN wrote: ↑2 years ago

Evilmiget0021 wrote: ↑2 years ago

Mikeoh wrote: ↑2 years ago

Could have fought us 1 Vs 1, would have been a glorious war not this cowards approach.

Imagine if all era DEMK told every alliance that asked:

"nah we aren't allied to LaCN" or "we wouldn't have LaCN's back if you jumped them"

You would have lost like 3 wars already by the time we decided to 1v1 you. Destruction was always coming for you. Don't make military alliances you don't intend to honor, especially with us. You're welcome for a peaceful 80% of this era.

What hasn't been said is that DEMK wouldn't budge from wanting to war Cerb/RL ( Seems you were fed BS info ) when we wanted to war NWO/RL.
AFAIK when you make a "military alliance" you have to come to a mutual agreement which we couldn't so that was the straw that broke the camels back.

So in short, we wouldn't do what you wanted to you chucked a tantrum

We only wanted to war RL/Cerb because we heard they were going to jump you. We were coming to your aid for a pre-emptive strike.

AxEHeaD15 wrote: ↑2 years ago

Elmo_LaCN wrote: ↑2 years ago

Evilmiget0021 wrote: ↑2 years ago

Imagine if all era DEMK told every alliance that asked:

"nah we aren't allied to LaCN" or "we wouldn't have LaCN's back if you jumped them"

You would have lost like 3 wars already by the time we decided to 1v1 you. Destruction was always coming for you. Don't make military alliances you don't intend to honor, especially with us. You're welcome for a peaceful 80% of this era.

What hasn't been said is that DEMK wouldn't budge from wanting to war Cerb/RL ( Seems you were fed BS info ) when we wanted to war NWO/RL.
AFAIK when you make a "military alliance" you have to come to a mutual agreement which we couldn't so that was the straw that broke the camels back.

So in short, we wouldn't do what you wanted to you chucked a tantrum

We only wanted to war RL/Cerb because we heard they were going to jump you. We were coming to your aid for a pre-emptive strike.

DEMK has had a hard on for RL/Cerb since we ( DEMK/LaCN/RL/Cerb ) jumped SR way back when, due to them not adding more sabbers onto SRs higher ups

But we see how DEMK/SR/NWO/FoD ( Cant forget FoD ) go about things. Sadly this was hardly a war, you guys took some, we took some but in the end its still a numbers game and we werent on the side of the numbers.

We will get our pound of flesh one of these days

sounds like fun .. i love promises. by the way, what happened to Rasta?

bloodpirate wrote: ↑2 years ago sounds like fun .. i love promises. by the way, what happened to Rasta?

He has been called away from koc for the foreseeable future due to IRL reasons

Elmo_LaCN wrote: ↑2 years ago

bloodpirate wrote: ↑2 years ago sounds like fun .. i love promises. by the way, what happened to Rasta?

He has been called away from koc for the foreseeable future due to IRL reasons

That sucks

In other news, age is ending soon, and wanted to say this was a fun war for our side. DEMK would like to thank NWO/SR/FoD and say they did a fantastic job.

Certain LaCN put up a good fight, and still are. Skar, Rasta, Donk, Elmo, Screwy, Bloodbad, Firekilla, and even PuntingJawa all put forth effort until close to the end.

That being said, I think all parties agree that we destroyed LaCN quickly and efficiently!

Thanks for the fun lads and ladies

If you guys didn't win a 4v1 then there should be some concerns.