Search found 59 matches
- 4 years ago
- Forum: Era 3
- Topic: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP/LaCN vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
- Replies: 382
- Views: 639998
Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/LGC/TOF/NWO/etc
For those of you too dumb to understand what I'm saying in the last sentence. I'm calling DEMK pussies for turking because of their "real life" situations. Everyone has a real life (except Dank) get over it. Yeah.....that's why you could not capitalize on your greater resources, and our g...
- 4 years ago
- Forum: Era 3
- Topic: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP/LaCN vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
- Replies: 382
- Views: 639998
Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/LGC/TOF/NWO/etc
Dank gave out of 40b in sells during the war. We had 1 account sell to him before you guys asked for help because we knew with him growing freely along with our massive tff/econ difference it was only a matter of time until our bigs lost rfmz. The war was clearly in a stalemate and there were days ...
- 4 years ago
- Forum: Era 3
- Topic: GLD v DEMK/NSG
- Replies: 288
- Views: 959292
Re: GLD v DEMK/NSG
I said founder / leader. And you know who is in that conversation.chrisl7605 wrote: ↑4 years ago No one is reading your essays.
The only alliance I founded was DEMK and that alliance died years ago when machine handed it over to SR.
- 4 years ago
- Forum: Era 3
- Topic: GLD v DEMK/NSG
- Replies: 288
- Views: 959292
Re: GLD v DEMK/NSG
@Chris Hah, a conversation with a regular member - not really representative in the same way as a GLD founder / leader asking for a truce and pitching the alternative as everyone selling off. That's pretty much a signal that the entire alliance will commit hara-kiri if they don't get a truce. You do...
- 4 years ago
- Forum: Era 3
- Topic: GLD v DEMK/NSG
- Replies: 288
- Views: 959292
Re: GLD v DEMK/NSG
Coincidence that you pretty much privately surrendered? We just moved on after we beat you.
- 4 years ago
- Forum: Era 3
- Topic: GLD v DEMK/NSG
- Replies: 288
- Views: 959292
Re: GLD v DEMK/NSG
Out of context? LOL. It is one single message. With one single objective. And showing one single state of mind. Defeat.
You don't need help when your opponents gave up 3 days ago.
You don't need help when your opponents gave up 3 days ago.
- 4 years ago
- Forum: Era 3
- Topic: GLD v DEMK/NSG
- Replies: 288
- Views: 959292
Re: GLD v DEMK/NSG
This should be definitive. Your leader asking for a truce and positioning the alternative as selling everyone off
That coupled with Dank buckling under pressure, it is pretty clear now you were finished a while ago. We just moved on.
That coupled with Dank buckling under pressure, it is pretty clear now you were finished a while ago. We just moved on.
- 4 years ago
- Forum: Era 3
- Topic: GLD v DEMK/NSG
- Replies: 288
- Views: 959292
Re: GLD v DEMK/NSG
Just like how you had to pitch in with the sell from your entire account to get DEMK sabbers off Glads? If that's what you're referring to? Then no.
- 4 years ago
- Forum: Era 3
- Topic: GLD v DEMK/NSG
- Replies: 288
- Views: 959292
Re: GLD v DEMK/NSG
Is that why you were asking for a truce 48h hours ago and threatening to eat all your accounts if we didn't? Smells like losing to me. no one threatened anything, the things you make up in that crazy little head of yours is hilarious. Its even funnier you get your alliance to believe it, amazing ac...
- 4 years ago
- Forum: Era 3
- Topic: GLD v DEMK/NSG
- Replies: 288
- Views: 959292
Re: GLD v DEMK/NSG
Is that why you were asking for a truce 48h hours ago and threatening to eat all your accounts if we didn't? Smells like losing to me.