Search found 59 matches

by The RMFz
4 years ago
Forum: Era 3
Topic: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP/LaCN vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
Replies: 382
Views: 639998

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/LGC/TOF/NWO/etc

For those of you too dumb to understand what I'm saying in the last sentence. I'm calling DEMK pussies for turking because of their "real life" situations. Everyone has a real life (except Dank) get over it. Yeah.....that's why you could not capitalize on your greater resources, and our g...
by The RMFz
4 years ago
Forum: Era 3
Topic: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP/LaCN vs RL/RB/GLD/NWO
Replies: 382
Views: 639998

Re: SR/DEMK/NSG/FFLOP vs RL/RB/GLD/LGC/TOF/NWO/etc

Dank gave out of 40b in sells during the war. We had 1 account sell to him before you guys asked for help because we knew with him growing freely along with our massive tff/econ difference it was only a matter of time until our bigs lost rfmz. The war was clearly in a stalemate and there were days ...
by The RMFz
4 years ago
Forum: Era 3
Topic: GLD v DEMK/NSG
Replies: 288
Views: 959292

Re: GLD v DEMK/NSG

chrisl7605 wrote: 4 years ago No one is reading your essays.

The only alliance I founded was DEMK and that alliance died years ago when machine handed it over to SR.
I said founder / leader. And you know who is in that conversation.
by The RMFz
4 years ago
Forum: Era 3
Topic: GLD v DEMK/NSG
Replies: 288
Views: 959292

Re: GLD v DEMK/NSG

@Chris Hah, a conversation with a regular member - not really representative in the same way as a GLD founder / leader asking for a truce and pitching the alternative as everyone selling off. That's pretty much a signal that the entire alliance will commit hara-kiri if they don't get a truce. You do...
by The RMFz
4 years ago
Forum: Era 3
Topic: GLD v DEMK/NSG
Replies: 288
Views: 959292

Re: GLD v DEMK/NSG

Coincidence that you pretty much privately surrendered? We just moved on after we beat you.
by The RMFz
4 years ago
Forum: Era 3
Topic: GLD v DEMK/NSG
Replies: 288
Views: 959292

Re: GLD v DEMK/NSG

Out of context? LOL. It is one single message. With one single objective. And showing one single state of mind. Defeat.

You don't need help when your opponents gave up 3 days ago.
by The RMFz
4 years ago
Forum: Era 3
Topic: GLD v DEMK/NSG
Replies: 288
Views: 959292

Re: GLD v DEMK/NSG

This should be definitive. Your leader asking for a truce and positioning the alternative as selling everyone off :lol:

That coupled with Dank buckling under pressure, it is pretty clear now you were finished a while ago. We just moved on.
by The RMFz
4 years ago
Forum: Era 3
Topic: GLD v DEMK/NSG
Replies: 288
Views: 959292

Re: GLD v DEMK/NSG

Just like how you had to pitch in with the sell from your entire account to get DEMK sabbers off Glads? If that's what you're referring to? Then no.
by The RMFz
4 years ago
Forum: Era 3
Topic: GLD v DEMK/NSG
Replies: 288
Views: 959292

Re: GLD v DEMK/NSG

Is that why you were asking for a truce 48h hours ago and threatening to eat all your accounts if we didn't? Smells like losing to me. no one threatened anything, the things you make up in that crazy little head of yours is hilarious. Its even funnier you get your alliance to believe it, amazing ac...
by The RMFz
4 years ago
Forum: Era 3
Topic: GLD v DEMK/NSG
Replies: 288
Views: 959292

Re: GLD v DEMK/NSG

Is that why you were asking for a truce 48h hours ago and threatening to eat all your accounts if we didn't? Smells like losing to me.